It would be more like the British occupying every town in the 13 colonies, eradicating the American armies to the LAST man and occupying the capital while the Americans still don’t surrender because they got the french supporting them. How to fix stellaris war exhaustion system: -Remove war exhaustion system and replace it with an occupied planets stability level, and an army capacity (Similar to fleet capacity), and a war goal completion meter, (for how likely it is you will achieve your war goal, affects surrender and other aspects, similar to the old system but without. They haven't had a. . Buster_cherryUA. The problem was I couldn't make status quo. The two are rarely entirely connected. Why does it increase equally when the other side lost more; well it could be comparatively less to their grand total. I agree that some war goals, like vassalize, are stupidly hard to complete vs more than one enemy, but the logic of why they won't surrender is very easy to understand. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. The Negotiate UI is. Everything is glorious. But in theory if not one of the empires sue for peace it could go on. i joined a war as a third party and attacked them. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. May 7, 2021 Jump to latest Follow Reply So an ally I had a Def. War fatigue is specifically designed to make it hard for you to destroy big empires in 1 war, so it is doing its job. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. Rebels of an ally won't surrender despite now reaching 100% War Exhaustion in their rebellion war. so. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. Can't invade the ally to try and force a surrender either since there's a 4th nation blocking you. • 2 yr. (Future mentions will list the non-scaled amount in parentheses) Every 10 (50) war exhaustion, further gain will be reduced by 5% (scaling multiplicatively), capped at 40. This also means that the two sides of the war might choose different war goals, and as such, the status quo resolution will have mixed rules. It says I have -1000 acceptance simply because of my “Absorption” Wargoal. It's far more devastating than catapults and cannons, but they're always there. AI will never surrender to a total war war goal even if. So at that point, your empire has had enough and they press for peace. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. pops feel drained by the mental strain of their telepathic cry for help (flavor text) Possible negative effects after war along with % chance of happening: 20% decreased biological pop resource output-- 30% chance. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. I destroy the star fortress and flip it to my side, then I start bombing the two planets. WTF is war on a timer?. In a hypothetical example of empire A beginning a liberation war (ideology casus belli) against empire B, and empire B picks a conquest war goal, then a status quo resolution means: empire A keeps nothing. Question. You were NOT the war leader. They. Yes, they have enough fleets somewhere. "Unfortunately I don't have a save from before I got ♥♥♥♥♥♥ by the giga empire supporting this small pos colony, I was honestly hoping that because I had 100% war exhaustion that the war would end in 2 years, like the game told me it would before, but the game continued to let the giga empire ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ me for a sold. War exhaustion makes no sense. For many casus belli it's pointless to pursue surrender because status quo already gives you everything you want. But every war is different. Also the fact that claims and capitol dont have very much weight in comparison. If on defense you can setup defenses so that you can force it higher over time so the opposition must white peace. But then you see the dreaded pop up. 631. A little bit of a click-baity title, specifically I'm really tired of being unable to claim victory due to stupid numbers of civs in a war. Rebels of an ally won't surrender despite now reaching 100% War Exhaustion in their rebellion war. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. step 4 : when you take a system with a planet in it land your army units on the planet to take it. . If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. War needs a rework imo. War Exhaustion is terrible. If you don't end the. Well I was fighting against a hive that wants to consume, they had super giant fleet yet no battle occured just position warfare. As for you vs them there are 3 main factors. Enforce a status quo. Over the decades, I've managed to beat them into "Inferior/Pathetic" fleet status, and claim a third of their empire. Mainly. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Just because. step 3 : start taking systems with your flees and put your army right behind him. The war exhaustion in this. • 3 yr. Any time a ship is lost. Destroying the enemy's entire fleet only gets you. If you load the attached save game, you'll see the Adeex State (rebels) have been on 100% WE for years now, but won't surrender and oddly, hasn't been defeated. With automatic Status Quo. I've also occupied around 6 planets as part of my goals, Killing 86 of their armies without. Use a race with modifiers to war exhaustion. It's not when they surrender. War exhaustion contributes a bit to it, but is otherwise irrelevant for beating an opponent. Each side has a war leader. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion. After 2 battles with the enemy. Usually if. The modifiers above are for when the AI 'voluntarily' accepts a. Disclaimer: I don't have Nemesis and Overlord + no mods installed. Stellaris peace system is about the most unfun peace system of all the paradox strategy games. Waging wars in Stellaris ever since the CB system was added was not exactly fun. when you can occupy everything but still lose. Join. There was no way to force AI to surrender. If you look closely, there is a small separation between the bottom of the War Exhaustion box and the Occupation tracker. If you wish to be closer to RL then after having a high war exhaustion you should have penalties equalling a percentage of your total income. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. Originally posted by Agent Orange: When an empire or alliance in a war reaches 100% war exhaustion, it can be forced into a status quo peace if you want to. 631. Pro tip: never, ever expect a surrender, never assume the other side will surrender and never surrender yourself if it loses planets. 3 is based off the fleet value of the ship and your ship capacity. Which seems a tad muchI feel your pain. I lost zero soldiers on the attack, because it was a test game and I had way over-tiered soldiers they had no hope of resisting. Novaseerblyat • Machine Intelligence • 6 mo. So losing a battleship hurts more than losing a corvette. Your fleet cap is really low, their cap is probably at least 4 times yours at a minimum. The war exhaustion information is always accurate, but working out where the war exhaustion comes from can be essentially impossible in all but the most straight forward engagements. The. You actually reached 100% war exhaustion and didn't notice it. Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. No, you're wrong. Before year 2394 (earliest save I can load back), we reached 74% / 100% in War Exhaustion, and I thought I had just to wait for a couple of years before status quo would be chosen by my war leader. The war has been going on for about 2 years now, but our enemies reached 100% exhaustion quite awhile ago, and are not surrendering. Posted by u/slartinartfast256 - 2 votes and 3 commentsYes, war exhaustion is terrible. 113. . GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. ago. Thats surprising given the design goal was specifically made to account for this. To get them to surrender is much more difficult, and in vassalization, it's when you control every planet/habitat by invading them. You can win a fight but gain more exhaustion because you lost a higher proportion of your ships, same with invasions. I did lose 40 capacity's worth of ships, but that's it. 75% of systems plus 75% war exhaustion would work). Bombing runs were just that, runs. Shad May 18, 2018 @ 5:08pm. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems you hold. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. The fact that you are at war with a xeno empire does affect politics and ethic attraction, winning/ surrender does the same. Stellaris is explicitly a space GSG, war had just taken the spotlight because everything else was shallow and unsatisfying. " I feel like this is a solid change. Y'can call it exhaustion if you want, against skynet its not exhaustion, it's just a timer. The only way to force surrender is to do what you have claimed to have done: Occupy everything the opposing side owns (including allies if they have any). You gain +100 from war exhaustion, +100 from occupying their entire empire and +50 from having a superior fleet. Especially now that somehow AI seems to rampantly Vassalize to a degree that I cannot comprehend how they make such agreements, it's very hard to be in a war with only 1 or 2 enemies. There are many complaints on the forums and internet about the way War Exhaustion currently works in Stellaris as of version 2. 2. 2. More confusingly, my enemy has zero war exhaustion from all these battles he has lost. You refuse the offer because you are sure you can conquer all it's planets and systems. Step 6: crash your economy because you choose a conquer war goal insteed vassalizing and enjoy micro manging all. After 2 battles with the enemy. Usually an AI empire will become willing to voluntarily surrender well before you reach that point. . You can never 'force' a surrender. No one wants to keep fighting forever. Buster_cherryUA. #1. I decimate my enemies' fleets completely. the other attacking enemy was on like 100% war exhaustion. ago. ago. Before stage five, they actually don't even get a total war CB. The war exhaustion system in stellaris is quite different. Because sometimes they don't even build ships. (though the murderous empire should be able to be exausted into surrender). Cannot surrender or status quo unless you reach 100% exhaustion. It can be useful for him, too. . I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. One of my playthroughs with a buddy, we both severely overpowered a stubborn neighbor. Everstill Colonel. So you can see how you get situations like the OP where the AI fights this massive, decimating battle and seems to get no war exhaustion from it. r/Stellaris. This is especially true in the case of wars of conquest, in which it is possible to get everything you want out of the war even if you are forced to accept a status quo peace. When the enemy's war exhaustion hits 100% (attrition slowly ticks up), you can force a status quo after two years regardless of whatever other acceptance penalties they have. The only no forced status quo situation would be two genocidal empires fighting, which would make sense, once war is declared it's a battle to. About the first three years, the enemy's war weariness has reached 100%, and I think he will surrender automatically after two or three years, as written in the wiki. Destroying the enemy's entire fleet only gets you +50 points and getting them to 100% war exhaustion only gets you +100. Stellaris. #7. Like, I've captured every single starbase, occupied every single planet, blown every single navy into so much stardust, but the opposing government - presumably now based directly beneath a mountain of my occupying soldiers - fundamentally refuses to surrender, because five seconds before the war broke out they signed a defensive pact with a one. I'm stuck in a war, I'm not one of the leaders, and I need it to end. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. Speaking of using RP to explain certain game mechanics, I think it makes sense that losing troops on planetary defense wouldn't contribute to war exhaustion. #1. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. I'm pretty sure thats a bug and not intended. Also, exhaustion doesn't matter that much. 100% war exhaustion doesn't make you surrender, it just forces status quo. You just need enough to enforce the demand on the war screen that you need to check. The effect that has varies based on your war goals. But ok fine. Wars aren’t fun at all in this game and it’s because the associated mechanics are such a fucking slog that make shit like a border war for 4 systems turn into a drawn out. Don't fleet stack. . It takes 10 days for armies in orbit to land on a world. OgamiGoro Apr 13, 2020 @ 1:37pm. I find. corsairmarks. The only way to force an opponent to surrender in Stellaris is to occupy 100% of the opponents assets. War Exhaustion gain is done by losses as a percentage of your fleet cap. They can never force a surrender because of war exhaustion. Eventually its +100 from exhaustion so still -50. The attrition itself does nothing. I have the +100 War Exhaustion and +50 Relative Navy Strength. I am sorry to open yet another topic about this, but since it has been the tactic of the other side in this debate to spam this forum until the devs. I've occupied more than half of an enemy's systems including his capital - the only planet he had. 5 # Multiplier of war exhaustion gained from ships- Was 2. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. War exhaustion makes no sense. It doesn't measure anything. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. Otherwise you could just declare Containment war, exhaust them, and when they surrender instantly anex everything. Impose Ideology is -100; Humiliate is -50; Conquer scales with the amounts of claims you have. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. This is the problem with the war exhaustion system: it makes no sense. If the. It is now about war exhaustion. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their ideology. pops feel drained by the mental strain of their telepathic cry for help (flavor text) Possible negative effects after war along with % chance of happening: 20% decreased biological pop resource output-- 30% chance. This means that territories etc will all be reversed back to their pre-war status. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. This is the problem with the war exhaustion system: it makes no sense. so I have achieved all my war goals the enemy have nothing, all systems occupied by me war exhaustion is 20% 40% and rising like 1% per year nothing else happens, at this rate it will take another 60 years before this AI "morons" finaly surrenderAn empire declared war on a large fanatic purifier empire. #9. BUT only a status quo can be forced, not a surrender!I've noticed something in the game I'm in. War exhaustion represents your population’s willingness to continue fighting. I lost zero soldiers on the attack, because it was a test game and I had way over-tiered soldiers they had no hope of resisting. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. When someone reaches 100 exhaustion, the "winning" side can force status quo after 2 years. g. I have completely occupied the main targets space and I mean there is literally not a single system or star that they have control over, their fleet is removed and my main fleets are on their way to blitzkrieg their ally aswell. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. I decided to vassalise some roaches to steal their ring world, so I declare war on the roaches and their 1 ally. I think you have basically disabled War Exhaustion. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). However, I am the on gaining more war exhaustion despite not engaging at all. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. But ok fine. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. Dec 30, 2010. The problem is that you usually do not. 0 Now 0. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. Goal was to cede one planet and vassalize remainder. 12. Check the beta, there was a patch notes and dev diary listing the change: "100 war exhaustion no longer forces you to surrender. It normally only ends than and not when only one hits it. But even with this setup, the AI does not surrender at 100%. Once a war side reaches 100% war exhaustion, there is now a 24 month timer that starts ticking down. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Forced status quo is something one side can trigger when their opponent has been at 100% war exhaustion for at least 2 years, but they don't have to do that if they don't want to. (by your opponent) And 24 months after your opponent hits 100% exhaustion, your opponent can be forced into Status Quo (by you, but that nearly never comes up because the AI always accepts at 100% itself). It made absolutely no sense. War exhaustion . 100% War Exhaustion just means that who ever reaches this state, has to accept a status quo peace. But yeah, also Exhaustion gain should probably be adjusted. Being at 100% war exhaustion isn't a surrender, it means you have to accept a. " I feel like this is a solid change. With automatic Status Quo. CryptoA war where nothing happens should build up We, but being stuck at 100 for years with no way out but surrender seems like a bad outcome. The exhaustion in Stellaris, as mention above, is absolutely not tied to the necessary war. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. Your ally, not you, was the war leader and he forced. In the case of a subjugation war, if you get a status quo then all the systems you fully occupy (meaning own the star base AND have successfully invaded with armies if there's a planet) wil splinter off into another new empire as your vassal. Honestly stellaris should just import eu4's war exhaustion, stability and war score system (but add more ws gain. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. once they hit 100% war exhaustion they should get another +100 on top of the war exhaustion for high war exhaustion which would easily push it over to vassalization. "Furthermore, I think Carthage should be destroyed. But no, they just give 0. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. and I have 30% again despite minimal casualties and no system losses. You don't surrender because an enemy is shaking is fist at your walls. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. Our federation had 90% war weariness by the time they were at 50%. g. If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. You have to open the war view and choose "status quo. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. vassailize war goal -100 War exhaustion +97. I've rarely seen situations where reaching 100% war exhaustion made much of a difference to me. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. When a war side's War Exhaustion hits 100%, they can be forced into a Status Quo peace (more on this below). 100% war exhaustion means you used up what your country considers to be an okay amount of resources for war. Thats another problem Stellaris has had from day one, no seperate peace. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. It should be a scaling modifier like in EU4. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. 11. However -4 is not a lot and they do not have full exhaustion yet. Otherwise there would be zero reason to ever surrender, because 100% would just be a number. Reply. 13 votes, 29 comments. The extra +100 only applies to status quo lol. When you reach 100 war exhaustion, you can't be forced to surrender unconditionally. I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. I understand how it works, generally, that losing territory and battles increases your war exhaustion. War score is the measure of 'winning' a war. 1. It only really exists to avoid having never ending wars and doesn’t feel like it represents a real war exhaustion (no impact on anything, except artificially. All in all, a very frustrating experience. Aaronthelemon Dec 12, 2018 @ 6:48am. Gestalt (-20% war exhaustion) Claim on a single system I wanted to conquer, I didnt want to commit to a full conquest. I 100% devastate all their worlds, THEN capture them. Every other paradox game has War Score which is basically a track of who is winning and by how much. If you can't land on his planets, then a war amounts to nothing, unless you actually just want their empty systems. As most of us know, war exhaustion in Stellaris is little more than a timer that eventually force empires to sign a white…Here's the exhaustion details: Attrition: 14%. Yes war exhaustion should exist but in a very different way. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. You've missed one planet (-100) and two systems (-40. Almost all our war weariness came from just normal accumulation, while that had about 20% from space battles (they got massacred) and only like 8% from almost their entire federation being conquered. The best part of war exhaustion is that "apparently" the game counts the ameba bubbles as a very valuable ship because when I lost it on a war on its juvenile from my war exhaustion jumped 8 points by itself. Why is my war exhaustion going up despite buffs, traditions, and not getting even close to losing. Great job ruining a great game, im ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ done. War exhaustion exists solely to force an end to wars, so the losing empire can recover. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. There are no other mechanisms tied to it. It usually says why they won't capitulate. After invading every planet and capturing all their systems the war ends with status quo. The first step is to have a functioning and efficient economy. . One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. If nothing's claimed and occupied, no side loses or gains anything. frogandbanjo • 5 yr. Your enemy War Exhaustion will not increase beyond 100%. immortalfirelover • 5 yr. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every system in their empire and it reduces their. You actually reached 100% war exhaustion and didn't notice it. ago. . #2. Maraudeur. I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. Business, Economics, and Finance. Otherwise you could just declare Containment war, exhaust them, and when they surrender instantly anex everything. For occupation it is more important to occupy their planets, than the systems/starbases. Mix and match till you come up to 200 and they will accept. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). Because right now - according to the Devs no less - forcing surrender requires 100% war exhaustion AND 100% occupation. Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. ago. [deposit id] effect add_district =. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every. It will make them accept any status quo peace you offer (in wich you would get the terriotries you have claims on AND occupy militarily, so often a white peace is a way better option to end a war then going. The whole galaxy joined and we stomped the enormous FP empire. The difference is in occupations. Question. You have the perfect start. Business, Economics, and Finance. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. Wanted to vassal him vs invade and destroy but when I declared war same thing happened as the first. The AI…This war has been going on for almost 15 years. If you occuppy 90% of the required claims and won 90% of the battles that should be considered a win in my book, and if you lose 1 battle it shouldn't lead to an immediate forced white peace. There's a war exhaustion calculation weirdness. So I think I’m about to lose this war due to my war exhaustion but the problem is, not only have I won every engagement, I’m occupying all of their…100% exhaustion lets you force a status quo, but not a full surrender. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0 War. 1 Giltiriel • 5 yr. 24 months after you hit 100% exhaustion, you can be forced into Status Quo. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. white peace is your goal in war for Stellaris. If one side has 100%, a countdown starts and at the end of it the other side can force peace. Whenever i attack someone, my war exhaustion builds up much faster than them, even if im getting all my claimed systems and that being my wargoal.